:Analogies for Sustainable Development/Adaptive flexibility as musical instrument
Analogy Ranking and Review |
---|
Analogy Characteristics
Style: |
Analogy Quality
Rigor: |
Article Quality
Peer review: |
“Our open-ended behavioral flexibility, as individuals and as cultures, requires a genetically evolved architecture ... A more poetic metaphor than a “Darwin machine” is a musical instrument. It can produce an infinite number of songs but also has a single 'nature.'" (Wilson, 2009)[1]
Overview
editDavid Sloan Wilson uses the metaphor of a musical instrument to demonstrate the difference between evolved innateness or “genetic determinism” and evolved adaptive flexibility or capacity for change. An instrument like a guitar, violin or saxophone has a certain inflexible structure, designed for a certain purpose, but the number of sounds and melodies one can produce with it are infinite. They are up to the player, but whether a tune sounds nice and appropriate is also dependent on the environment. The human brain can certainly be thought of as one of those instruments. Although all instruments have a rigid structure, some instruments are built to be more flexible (in the types of sounds they can make) than others - consider the difference between a woodblock, a flute, and a synthesizer.
Analogy Map
editInstrument | Biological | Human |
---|---|---|
Physical structure | Genome | Human genomee |
Variability of notes | Gene expression | behavioral and psychological flexibility |
Musician | ||
Listeners |
Discussion
editThis analogy helps clarify the difference and relationship between “genetic determinism” and adaptive flexibility. Flexibility is a result of genetically evolved structure. Other examples of genetically rigid structures with evolved flexibility are the immune system and the human brain.
Quote Bank
editFurther Resources
editReferences
edit- ↑ Wilson, D. S. (2009). Does evolution explain human nature? Yes and no. Does Evolution Explain Human Nature? John Templeton Foundation, 44–47.