Open main menu

User:JWSchmidt/Blog/28 February 2007

This page is part of
JWSchmidt's Wikiversity blog
Feel free to add comments.
16 August 2015 - Wiki Studies
16 April 2011 - Openness
29 January 2011 - Drama Queens
13 June 2010 - Bull
5 April 2010 - Breaches
22 September - Experts
27 January - Your Banned
14 January 2009 - Wikiversity Bans
14 November - Custodianship
19 October - Review Part II
10 October - My vacation
16 September - Moulton
15 September - Forking
7 September - Distorting
27 August - Wikipedia studies
1 March 2008 - The real world
12 January - Fair Use and the GFDL
2 January 2008 - Wiki Council
---- start 2008 ----
31 December - Participatory Learning
19 December - Foundation Changes
1 December - Changing the GFDL?
13 November - What is Wikiversity?
10 November - Expert editors (part II)
14 October 2007 - Vandal Wiki
20 September - Collaborative video interface
4 September - Open Source Crusade
31 August - CheckUser
4 August - Collaborative videos
20 July - Options for video-in-wiki
1 July - Networking Web 2.0 Websites
7 June 2007 - GFDL violations
27 May - Wikiversity namespace
22 May 2007 - Wikiversity tagline
20 May - The newbie game
16 May - Tangled Hierarchies
12 May - Navigation boxes
11 May 2007 - Forced editing
9 May - Wikipedia Learning
6 May - Music collaborations
25 Mar - Reliable Sources
17 Mar - Version flagging
11 Mar - Research policy discussion
10 Mar 2007 - Credentials
3 Mar - Free media files
28 Feb - Delete or develop?
27 Feb 2007 - Main Page
25 Feb - Science and Protoscience
23 Feb - Complementing Wikipedia
21 Feb - Copyleft media files
19 Feb - Gratis versus Libre
18 Feb 2007 - Referees
16 Feb - MediaWiki interface
15 Feb - Content development projects
14 Feb - Scope of Research
13 Feb 2007 - Review Board
12 Feb - Rounded corners
11 Feb - Open vs free content
10 Feb - Research guidelines
9 Feb - Learning resource diversity
8 February - Wikiversity referees.
7 February 2007 - Wikio.
5 February - Research policy.
2 February - Portal cleanup done.
31 January - Reliable sources.
29 January - Learning projects and materials.
27 January - Recording voice chat.
25 January - Animated GIF files with GIMP.
23 January - User page cleanup.
21 January 2007 - List of portals.
20 January - 2 more portals. "Courses"
19 Jan, - Portals and templates.
18 January site statistics - 20,000 pages.
18 January - Creating and organizing portals.
17 January - Categories of Wikiversity schools.
16 Jan. - Featured content development projects.
15 January - Wikiversity status at 5 months.
14 January - The "Topic:" namespace
13 January - Featured content
13 January - Wikiversity Bugs
12 January 2007 - Start of the blog
---- start 2007 ----
24 October, 2006 - Wikiversity history
26 April, 2005 - Wiki reality games
17 March, 2004 - Semantic prosthetic
edit this list

Deletionists vs content development
Because of the differences in age and mission, Wikipedia has different problems than Wikiversity. However, there is always tension in wikis between the desire to remove useless and distracting pages and the desire to allow new wiki participants a chance to start editing. In the case of Wikiversity, it has been fairly common for some participants to create lists of topics for particular subject areas (example) or lists of lessons for particular topics (example). Many of these lists of "red links" were created at Wikibooks and imported to Wikiversity. I like to think of these lists as working proposals for content development. The existence of these lists of proposed learning resources with links to non-existent pages is one of the main reasons it made sense to turn Wikiversity school and topic pages into content development projects.

A potential problem with these lists of red links is that many visitors come to Wikiversity without having any idea what the red links mean, how to edit a wiki webpage, or what to do if they happen to click on a red link and suddenly see this:

Edit window.png

I suspect that many people just hit their back button. Other people make a small edit and Wikiversity has another stubby page. The first impulse of some administrators is to delete such stubs on sight. In contrast, I like the idea of using a welcome template on such pages. The template called {{Welcome and expand}} can be used to put the following on a stub page:

Please help

This page was created, but so far very little useful content has been added. Everyone is invited to help add educational content to Wikiversity. If you need help learning how to add content, see the editing tutorial.

In fact, I would like it if the MediaWiki software was configured to automatically add this template to short page with no category tag. That would have the advantage of automatically providing the creators of stubby pages with a link to a page where they can find out more about editing.

There has been off-and-on discussion of providing Wikiversity with a systematic way to mark links to pages that are under construction. This would allow people to avoid following links to stubs. Another idea is "soft deletion" which would turn undesirable pages into soft redirects to their content. The redirect pages would explain what is wrong with the page contents and invite people who want to fix that content to continue on past the redirect page. Other people could just turn around and walk away.

I do not see this as a matter of "deletionsists" vs "inclusionists", but rather as a need to find the best way to encourage visitors to become participants. If we remove red links and stubs then we remove what are functionally invitations for people to get involved with editing the wiki. Maybe we need a little template that could be placed above lists of red links. The template could explain what red links are and invite visitors to join in the wiki editing process.