Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2024/Emotion and time perception

Heading casing

Hi U3243357. FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development ~~~~

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is below, plus see the general feedback page. Please also check the page history for changes made whilst reviewing the chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Marks are available via UCLearn. Marks are based on the latest version before the due date.

1. Title The title and sub-title are correctly worded and formatted 2. Headings See earlier comment about Heading casing Promising 2-level heading structure – could benefit from further development and/or refinement Influence and impacts seem like the same thing; consider combining Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but aim for closer alignment The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings 3. Overview Promising Does this section include genAI content? If so, it needs to be acknowledged as such in the edit summaries, otherwise it violates academic integrity. Add an image to the scenario; uploaded image was deleted due to lack of sufficient copyright information Simplify/abbreviate the description of the problem/topic. Move detail into subsequent sections. Use 3rd person perspective (except 1st/2nd person can work for feature boxes/scenarios) Reasonably good alignment between focus questions and heading structure, but consider closer alignment Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02) 4. Key points Excellent – key points are well developed for each section Excellent use of citations Move links to citations to the References (use dois) Good balance of theory and research Use 3rd person perspective, although a case study or feature box could use 1st or 2nd person perspective Consider using the Studiosity service and/or a service like Grammarly to help improve the quality of written expression such as checking grammatical and spelling errors Conclusion is underway What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) 5. Figure A relevant figure is not presented and cited (see Tutorial 2) The uploaded figure was deleted due to lack of sufficient copyright information (see Tutorial 3) 6. Learning feature Excellent use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of one or more scenarios/examples/case studies Excellent use of quiz question(s) Also consider using one or more tables to summarise key information 7. References Very good Are there any systematic reviews about this topic? Move non-academic / non-peer reviewed sources to External links Check and correct APA referencing style: capitalisation page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) 8. Resources See also Not developed – needs work (see Tutorial 2) External links Not developed – needs work (see Tutorial 2) 9. User page Good Brief description about self – consider expanding Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. A link to the book chapter is provided 10. Social contribution None summarised on user page with direct link(s) to evidence (see Tutorial 03). Looking ahead to the book chapter submission, see social contributions.

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:29, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is a good presentation Overview The opening conveys the purpose of the presentation in a reasonably good way The presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest A context for the presentation is established through an example Focus questions and/or an outline of topics are presented Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes very good use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes basic use of relevant psychological research The presentation makes insufficient/no use of citations to support claims The presentation makes basic use of examples The presentation provides good practical advice The presentation provides easy to understand information Conclusion The conclusion provides a very good summary of the most relevant psychological theory and research about this topic The conclusion provides reasonably good take-home message(s) Audio The presentation makes reasonably good use of narrated audio Audio communication is reasonably well-paced Consider slowing down and leaving longer pauses between sentences. This can help the listener to cognitively process the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point. Reasonably good intonation The narration is reasonably well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was poor The audio at the start of each slide appears to be cut off The narrated content is well matched to the target topic Video Overall, visual display quality is very good The presentation makes very good use of text and image based slides The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read Consider increasing line spacing to make the text easier to read The amount of text presented per slide makes it easy to read and listen at the same time The visual communication is supplemented in good/ way by relevant images and/or diagrams The presentation is well produced using simple tools The visual content is well matched to the target topic Meta-data The correct title is used, but the sub-title (or a shortened version of it) is not used, as the name of the presentation. This would help to convey the purpose of the presentation and be consistent. A brief written description of the presentation is provided. Expand. A link to the book chapter is not provided A link from the book chapter is provided The presentation is incorrectly categorised as being for kids. This creates limitations, such as being unable to add the presentation to a playlist. More info. Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated Provide clickable links to the image sources and license details (e.g., in the description) A copyright license for the presentation is in the description but not in the license field

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 01:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)