Talk:Motivation and emotion/Book/2023/Treatment motivation in substance use disorder

Case Study

Firstly, great start to your book chapter. I have reviewed your case study and I have a few suggestions.

1. Review for typos - last paragraph
2. Consider revising third paragraph - for example, some word choice may include - making a firm commitment to overcome her addiction. She made several attempts to break free from drug addiction, including seeking help through rehabilitation and counselling.
3. Be specific about the intervention. Was the pivotal factor receiving counselling using the reframing technique within motivational interviewing?

Justine :)

U103189 (discuss • contribs) 12:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Comment

Hi Kate,

I have done a quick browse of your topic development, and you do have some interesting ideas on how to tackle this topic. I understand that your question focuses on treatment motivation for substance use disorders, so I thought why not include a short paragraph on the causes of substance use. Why do individuals experience this in the first place? The reasons are endless, so feel free to focus on the ones that may interest you, or has deeper research!

(U3227684 (discuss • contribs)=U3227684) 10:36 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Dopamine-reward system in addiction

Here's an excellent podcast about the role of dopamine-reward system and treatment in addiction Dr. Anna Lembke: Between Pleasure and Pain [The Knowledge Project Ep. #159.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 23:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Cognitive Behavioural Therapʏ

Great topic development discussion points. I have found this YouTube video on CBT which has an understandable definition of how CBT works. I thought you could possibly mold this into interesting quiz questions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZdyOwZ4_RnI --U3189442 - K.Ryan (discuss • contribs) 00:12, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Topic development feedback

The topic development submission has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history for editing changes made whilst reviewing this chapter plan. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below and/or contacting the reviewer. Topic development marks are available via UCLearn. Note that marks are based on what was available before the due date.

Title The title is correctly worded and formatted The sub-title is correctly worded and formatted Headings Promising 3-level heading structure – could benefit from being simplified to 2-levels (e.g., barriers/facilitators could be a top-level heading if integrated into focus questions Consider unpacking top-level headings into sub-headings The Overview and Conclusion should not have sub-headings Overview Promising; very good Move case study to start of this section. Remove as a sub-heading. Remove focus questions as a sub-heading Remove extra line space at bottom of feature boxes Move additional detail into subsequent questions; keep the Overview brief and engaging. Revise focus questions; closer alignment between the sub-title, focus questions, and top-level headings is recommended Key points Promising development of key points for each section, with relevant citations Some of the comments that follow also relate to the structure/headings Be more selective about the most relevant theories Consider integrating discussion of relevant theories in subsequent sections and removing the "Motivational theories of addiction" heading Avoid double-barrelled headings (e.g., "What are the different types of treatment interventions and why do they work?". Be selective about treatments; this section isn't required to answer the sub-title question. They can however serve as useful examples if they illustrate something about motivation "Why is treatment motivation important ...?" might be better presented earlier Strive for an integrated balance of theory and research Conclusion (the most important section): Well developed But watch out for drift e.g., "which treatment interventions are the most successful for substance abuse disorder?" is not the topic What might the take-home, practical messages be? (What are the answer(s) to the question(s) in the sub-title and/or focus questions?) Figure A relevant figure is presented, captioned, and cited Caption could better explain how the image connects to key points being made in the main text Figure(s) are cited at least once in the main text Learning feature One use of in-text interwiki links for the first mention of key terms to relevant Wikipedia articles and/or to other relevant book chapters Promising use of example(s)/case study(ies) and quiz question(s) Consider including table(s) etc. References Good Use either APA style or wiki referencing style, but not both. Currently, a mixture of referencing styles is used. For APA referencing style, check and correct: capitalisation italicisation page numbers should be separated by an en-dash (–) rather than a hyphen (-) Resources See also Very good Use bullet-points (see Tutorial 02) Use sentence casing External links Not developed User page Very good Description about self provided – consider expanding Consider linking to your eportfolio page and/or any other professional online profile or resume such as LinkedIn. This is not required, but it can be useful to interlink your professional networks. Link provided to book chapter Social contribution Excellent – at least three different types of contributions with direct link(s) to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 04:02, 24 September 2023 (UTC)

Feedback

Hello,

I have noticed that in your reference list you have occasionally used hyphens - instead of en dashs – and that the title of the journal isn't in italics. U3197031 (discuss • contribs) 10:09, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Heading casing

FYI, the recommended Wikiversity heading style uses sentence casing. For example: Self-determination theory rather than Self-Determination Theory Here's an example chapter with correct heading casing: Growth mindset development -- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Book chapter review and feedback

This chapter has been reviewed according to the marking criteria. Written feedback is provided below, plus there is a general feedback page. Please also check the chapter's page history to check for editing changes made whilst reviewing through the chapter. Chapter marks will be available via UCLearn along with social contribution marks and feedback. Keep an eye on Announcements.

Overall Overall, this is a good chapter. It makes very good use of psychological theory and basic use of research to help address a real-world phenomenon or problem. There is some scope/focus issue in that the chapter tends to focus on substance abuse treatment rather than concentrating on the best psychological theory and research about the motivational factors involved in successful substance abuse treatment. There is a subtle but important difference. And this chapter should be focused on the former rather than the latter. The chapter seems to ultimately emphasise intrinsic motivation as the key component, but this seems to downplay how this can be facilitated and supported. For additional feedback, see the following comments and these copyedits Overview Basic Consider providing a case study or scenario with an image in a feature box to help engage reader interest Clearly explains the problem or phenomenon Focus questions needs redevelopment to be more targetted at the topic, rather than tackling tangential issues e.g., I've reworded the first focus question I've moved the focus questions into the Overview Theory A very good range of relevant theories are selected, described, and explained A wide range of theoretical perspectives are covered Consider making more extensive use of the best theory/theories e.g., transtheoretical model of change Consider developing tighter synthesis across the theoretical perspectives Build more strongly on other related chapters (e.g., by embedding links to other chapters) Reasonably good depth is provided about relevant theory(ies) No use of tables and/or lists are to help clearly convey key theoretical information There is a tendency to use non-academic sources when the best peer-reviewed psychological theory and/or research should be used instead. Some use of examples to illustrate theoretical concepts Research Basic review of relevant research What is the best research about what motivates engagement in treatment for substance abuse? More detail about key studies would be ideal Any systematic reviews or meta-analyses in this area? Greater emphasis on effect sizes could be helpful. Basic critical thinking about relevant research is evident Critical thinking about research could be further evidenced by: describing the methodology (e.g., sample, measures) in important studies discussing the direction of relationships considering the strength of relationships acknowledging limitations pointing out critiques/counterarguments suggesting specific directions for future research Integration Basic integration between theory and research The chapter places more emphasis on theory than on research Conclusion Reasonably good summary and conclusion Key points are well summarised Add practical, take-home message(s) Style Written expression Overall, the quality of written expression is good Internationalise: Write for an international, rather than domestic, audience. Australians make up only 0.32% of the world human population. Avoid one sentence paragraphs. Convey one idea per paragraph using three to five sentences.## Use 3rd person perspective (e.g., "it") rather than 1st (e.g., "we") or 2nd person (e.g., "you") perspective[1] in the main text, although 1st or 2nd person perspective can work well for case studies or feature boxes Avoid starting sentences with a citation unless the author is particularly pertinent. Instead, it is more interesting for the the content/key point to be communicated, with the citation included along the way or, more typically, in parentheses at the end of the sentence. "People" is often a better term than "individuals" Avoid overly emotive language (e.g,. guiding light) in science-based communication See earlier comments about heading casing Use serial commas[2] – they are part of APA style and are generally recommended by grammaticists. See explanatory video (1 min) Use Australian spelling (e.g., hypothesize vs. hypothesise; behavior vs. behaviour) Proofreading More proofreading is needed (e.g., fix punctuation and typographical errors) to bring the quality of written expression closer to a professional standard Remove unnecessary capitalisation APA style Use sentence casing for the names of disorders, therapies, theories, etc. Figures Figures are well captioned Each Figure is referred to at least once within the main text Refer to each Figure using APA style (e.g., see Figure 1) Citations use correct APA style Move non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section References use correct APA style Move non-peer-reviewed sources to the external links section Learning features Good use of learning features No use of embedded in-text links to related book chapters. Embedding in-text links to related book chapters helps to integrate this chapter into the broader book project. Good use of image(s) No use of table(s) Very good use of case studies Good use of feature box(es) Good use of quiz(zes) and/or reflection question(s) Very good use of interwiki links in the "See also" section Very good use of external links in the "External links" section Social contribution ~25 logged, useful, minor to moderate social contributions with direct links to evidence

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 00:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Multimedia presentation feedback

The accompanying multimedia presentation has been marked according to the marking criteria. Marks are available via the unit's UCLearn site. Written feedback is provided below, plus see the general feedback page. Responses to this feedback can be made by starting a new section below. If you would like further clarification about the marking or feedback, contact the unit convener.

Overall Overall, this is an excellent presentation Overview An opening slide with the title and sub-title is displayed and narrated — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation This presentation has a basic introduction to engage audience interest Establish a context for the presentation (e.g., by using an example or explaining why it is important), to help the viewer understand Consider asking focus questions that lead to take-away messages. This will help to focus and discipline the presentation. Content Comments about the book chapter may also apply to this section The presentation addresses the topic An appropriate amount of content is presented — not too much or too little The presentation makes excellent use of relevant psychological theory The presentation makes no explicit use of relevant psychological research The presentation includes citations to support claims The presentation makes excellent use of one or more examples or case studies or practical advice The presentation provides practical, easy to understand information Conclusion A Conclusion slide is presented with an excellent summary The presentation could be strengthened by expanding on the take-home message (e.g., answers to more than one focus question) Audio The audio is fun, easy to follow, and interesting to listen to The presentation makes effective use of narrated audio Audio communication is well paced Excellent pauses between sentences. This helps the viewer to cognitively digest the information that has just been presented before moving on to the next point. Excellent intonation enhances listener interest and engagement The narration is well practiced and/or performed Audio recording quality was excellent The narrated content is well matched to the target topic (see content) but lacked sufficient synthesis of the best psychological research about this topic Video Overall, visual display quality is excellent The presentation makes effective use of animated slides and/or stock video The font size is sufficiently large to make it easy to read The visual communication is effectively supplemented by images and/or diagrams The presentation is very well produced The visual content is well matched to the target topic (see content) but could be improved by synthesising key research Meta-data The chapter title and sub-title (or an abbreviation to fit within the 100 character limit) are used in the name of the presentation — this helps to clearly convey the purpose of the presentation. Abbreviate title and/or sub-title to include question mark. A written description of the presentation is provided Target an international audience Links to and from the book chapter are provided Licensing Image sources and their copyright status are communicated A copyright license for the presentation is provided

-- Jtneill - Talk - c 03:35, 8 November 2023 (UTC)