Radiation detectors provide a signal that is converted to an electric current. The device is designed so that the current provided is proportional to the characteristics of the incident radiation.

This tree diagram shows the relationship between types and classification of most common particle detectors. Credit: Wdcf.{{free media}}

There are detectors that provide a change in substance as the signal and these may be automated to provide an electric current or quantified proportional to the amount of new substance.

Def. a "device capable of registering a specific substance or physical phenomenon"[1] is called a detector.

Def. "a device that recovers information of interest contained in a modulated wave"[2] is called a radio detector.

Def. "a device used to detect, track, and/or identify high-energy particles, such as those produced by nuclear decay, cosmic radiation, or reactions in a particle accelerator"[3] is called a particle detector or radiation detector.

Def. "a device or organ that detects certain external stimuli and responds in a distinctive manner"[4] is called a sensor.

## Absorptions

This is an overview of electromagnetic radiation absorption. Credit: Jon Chui.{{free media}}

An example of applying Absorption spectroscopy is the first direct detection and chemical analysis of the atmosphere of a planet outside our solar system in 2001. Sodium filters the alien star light of HD 209458 as the hot Jupiter planet passes in front. The process and absorption spectrum are illustrated above. Credit: A. Feild, STScI and NASA website.{{free media}}

In the image at center visible light is used as a specific example of absorption spectroscopy. A white beam source – emitting light of multiple wavelengths – is focused on a sample (the complementary color pairs are indicated by the yellow dotted lines). Upon striking the sample, photons that match the energy gap of the molecules present (green light in this example) are absorbed in order to excite the molecule. Other photons transmit unaffected and, if the radiation is in the visible region (400-700nm), the sample color is the complementary color of the absorbed light. By comparing the attenuation of the transmitted light with the incident, an absorption spectrum can be obtained.

## Active galactic nuclei

The image contains a series of radio images at successive epochs using the VLBA of the jet in the broad-line radio galaxy 3C 111. Credit: M. Kadler, E. Ros, M. Perucho, Y. Y. Kovalev, D. C. Homan, I. Agudo, K. I. Kellermann, M. F. Aller, H. D. Aller, M. L. Lister, and J. A. Zensus.{{fairuse}}

Swedish crystal radio made by Radiola with earphones. Credit: Holger.Ellgaard.{{free media}}

A germanium diode is used in modern crystal radios (about 3 mm long). Credit: Aomorikuma.{{free media}}

Eastern end of the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands, is shown. Credit: Cumulus Clouds.{{free media}}

A crystal radio receiver is in the top right image. The device at its top is the cat's whisker detector, with a pair of earphone jacks provided.

A crystal radio receiver uses only the power of the received radio signal and is named for its most important component, a crystal detector, originally made from a piece of crystalline mineral such as galena.[5]

Galena (lead sulfide) was the most common crystal used,[6][7][8] but various other types of crystals were also used, the most common being iron pyrite (fool's gold, FeS2), silicon, molybdenite (MoS2), silicon carbide (carborundum, SiC), and a zincite-bornite (ZnO-Cu5FeS4) crystal-to-crystal junction trade-named Perikon.[9][10]

In modern sets, a semiconductor diode is used for the detector, which is much more reliable than a crystal detector and requires no adjustments.[9][11][12] Germanium diodes (or sometimes Schottky diodes) are used instead of silicon diodes, because their lower forward voltage drop (roughly 0.3 V compared to 0.6 V[13]) makes them more sensitive.[11][14]

Radio receivers are essential components of all systems that use radio, where the information produced by the receiver may be in the form of sound, moving images (television), or digital data.[15]

Each receiver (lowest image on the right) in the VLBA consists of a parabolic dish antenna 25 m (82 feet) in diameter, is about as tall as a ten-story building when the antenna is pointed straight up, where each antenna weighs about 218 metric tons (240 short tons), with its adjacent control building, containing the supporting electronics and machinery for the receiver, including low-noise electronics, digital computers, data storage units, and the antenna-pointing machinery for each of the antennas.[19]

## Alpha particles

A Bragg curve of 5.49 MeV alpha particles in air is illustrated. Credit: Helmut Paul.{{free media}}

Forming of alcohol condensation trails is described in a diffusion cloud chamber. Credit: Kotarak71.{{free media}}

Rutherford scattering of an alpha particle from a 210
Pb
source is shown in a diffusion cloud chamber. Credit: Qwerty123uiop.{{free media}}

An alpha particle from a 210
Pb
source near point 1 undergoes Rutherford scattering near point 2 of about 30° and scatters near point 3 coming to rest in the gas. The gas nucleus received enough kinetic energy in the elastic collision at point 2 to cause a short visible recoiling track near point 2.

## Breakdown voltages

Photo of long-flashover arrester (LFA) stressed by lighting stroke; a LFA is a lightning protection device for medium-voltage overhead power lines. Credit: Maremoto.{{free media}}

Def. the "minimum voltage that causes part of an insulator to become electrically conductive"[20] is called a breakdown voltage.

For sensitive electronics, excessive current can flow if a voltage spike exceeds a material's breakdown voltage, or if it causes avalanche breakdown.

Within rarefied gases found in certain types of lamps, breakdown voltage is also sometimes called the striking voltage.[21]

## Bubble chambers

In this photograph is recorded "[t]he first use of a hydrogen bubble chamber to detect neutrinos, on November 13, 1970. Credit: Argonne National Laboratory.{{free media}}

In the first use of a hydrogen bubble chamber to detect neutrinos, a neutrino hit a proton in a hydrogen atom. The collision occurred at the point where three tracks emanate on the right of the photograph.

"If neutrinos have negligible rest mass, the present density expected for relic neutrinos from the big bang is nν = 110 (Tγ/2.7 K)3 cm–3 for each two-component species. This is of order the photon density nγ, differing just by a factor 3/11 (i.e. a factor 3/4 because neutrinos are fermions rather than bosons, multiplied by 4/11, the factor by which the neutrinos are diluted when e+–e annihilation boosts the photon density). This conclusion holds for non-zero masses, provided that mvc2 is far below the thermal energy (~ 5 MeV) at which neutrinos decoupled from other species and that the neutrinos are stable for the Hubble time. Comparison with the baryon density, related to Ω via nb = 1.5 x 10–5 Ωb h2 cm–3, shows that neutrinos outnumber baryons by such a big factor that they can be dynamically dominant over baryons even if their masses are only a few electron volts. In fact, a single species of neutrino would yield a contribution to Ω of Ωv = 0.01 h–2 (mv)eV, so if h = 0.5, only 25 eV is sufficient to provide the critical density."[22]

"Neutrinos of nonzero mass would be dynamically important not only for the expanding universe as a whole but also for large bound systems such as clusters of galaxies. This is because they would now be moving slowly: if the universe had cooled homogeneously, primordial neutrinos would now be moving at around 200 (mv)-1eV km s–1. They would be influenced even by the weak (~ 10–5 c2) gravitational potential fluctuations of galaxies and clusters. If the three (or more) types of neutrinos have different masses, then the heaviest will obviously be gravitationally dominant, since the numbers of each species should be the same."[22]

## Clouds

The Solar Occultation for Ice Experiment uses solar occultation to measure cloud particles, temperature and atmospheric gases. Credit: NASA.{{free media}}

The Solar Occultation for Ice Experiment (SOFIE) uses solar occultation to measure cloud particles, temperature and atmospheric gases involved in forming the clouds to reveal the mixture of chemicals that prompt noctilucent cloud (NLC) formation, as well as the environment in which the clouds form.[23]

## Cosmic rays

Cloud chamber shows visible tracks from α-particles (short, thick) and β-particles (long, thin). Credit: Bionerd.{{free media}}

"The CMS [of the Galileo Orbiter Energetic Particles Detector (EPD)] contained two types of energetic particle telescopes. A small time-of-flight (TOF) telescope was oriented in the 0 degree direction while a pair of delta-E x E solid-state detector telescopes (covering higher energy ranges) were oriented in the opposite direction. The TOF portion of the CMS was modified during the post-Challenger period to permit a lower-energy threshold for composition measurements. The TOF telescope permitted the measurement of H ions from 80 keV-1.25 MeV, He from 27 keV/nucleon-1.0 MeV/nucleon, medium nuclei (O) between 12-522 keV/nucleon, intermediate nuclei (S) between 16-310 keV/nucleon, and heavy nuclei (Fe) between 20-200 keV/nucleon. The delta-E x E telescopes were designed to permit the measurement of Z>=2 ions to higher energies than those attained by the CMS TOF telescope. These instruments measured He (0.19-1.4 MeV/nucleon), medium nuclei (O: 0.16-10.7 MeV/nucleon), intermediate nuclei (Na: 1.0-11.7 MeV/nucleon), and heavy nuclei (Fe: 0.22-15.0 MeV/nucleon). The TOF telescope measured ions in 13 composition channels as did the delta-E x E telescopes."[24]

## Cryometeors

This drawing shows the Cloud Imaging and Particle Size (CIPS) detector of the AIM or Explorer 90 satellite. Credit: NASA.{{free media}}

The CIPS instrument has four cameras positioned at different angles, which provide multiple views of clouds from different angles and allow a determination of the sizes of the ice particles that make up the cloud,[25] and can be used to infer gravity waves in the atmosphere.[26]

## Electrons

This is an image of the Energetic Particles Detector (EPD) aboard the Galileo Orbiter. Credit: NASA.{{free media}}

"The Energetic Particles Detector (EPD) was designed to: (1) measure the energy and angular distribution, composition, and stability of trapped radiation at Jupiter; (2) study the interaction of these particles with the Galilean satellites and the solar wind; (3) derive thermal plasma flow velocities and temperatures; and, (4) examine adiabatic and non-thermal processes in the trapped radiation."[24]

The EPD "used two instruments: the Low-Energy Magnetospheric Measurements System (LEMMS) and the Composition Measurements System (CMS)."[24]

"[The] two bi-directional, solid-state detector telescopes [are] mounted on a platform which [is] rotated by a stepper motor into one of eight positions. This rotation of the platform, combined with the spinning of the orbiter in a plane perpendicular to the platform rotation, [permits] a 4-pi [or 4π] steradian coverage of incoming [electrons]. The forward (0 degree) ends of the two telescopes [have] an unobstructed view over the [4π] sphere or [can] be positioned behind a shield which not only [prevents] the entrance of incoming radiation, but [contains] a source, thus allowing background corrections and in-flight calibrations to be made."[24]

"The LEMMS was a double-ended telescope containing eight heavily shielded silicon solid-state surface barrier totally-depleted detectors. The 0 degree end of the LEMMS used magnetic deflection to separate incoming electrons and ions. The 180 degree end used absorbers in combination with the detectors to provide measurements of higher-energy electrons and ions. The LEMMS provided measurements of electrons from 15 keV to greater than 11 MeV and of ions from 22 keV to about 55 MeV in 32 rate channels."[24]

"The LEMMS detectors were capable of handling particle incidence rates up to 600,000 counts/s without requiring significant rate corrections for detector dead time. The CMS electronics were more rate restricted, with the TOF telescope capable of operating at rates well above 150,000 counts/s and the delta-E x E telescopes experiencing problems around 50,000 counts/s."[24]

## Emission detectors

Cross-sectional view shows the ZEPLIN-III experiment (CAD) illustrating WIMP and neutron interactions in the liquid xenon target and neutron capture and detection in the anti-coincidence veto detector. Credit: Wimpybuns.{{free media}}

Event from ZEPLIN-III liquid xenon detector with optical simulation insets are shown. Credit: Wimpybuns.{{free media}}

In two-phase xenon – so called since it involves liquid and gas phases in equilibrium – the scintillation light produced by an interaction in the liquid is detected directly with photomultiplier tubes; the ionisation electrons released at the interaction site are drifted up to the liquid surface under an external electric field, and subsequently emitted into a thin layer of xenon vapour: once in the gas, they generate a second, larger pulse of light (electroluminescence or proportional scintillation), which is detected by the same array of photomultipliers, where such systems are known as xenon 'emission detectors'.[27]

"Liquid xenon emission detectors [1–3] have proven extremely useful for rare-event search experiments, such as for direct detection of galactic dark matter."[28]

In the image at the right, the ZEPLIN-III experiment: the WIMP detector, built mainly out of copper, included two chambers within a cryostat vessel: the upper one contained 12 kg of active liquid xenon; an array of 31 photomultipliers operated immersed in the liquid to detect prompt scintillation as well as delayed electroluminescence from a thin gas layer above the liquid. The lower chamber contained liquid nitrogen to provide cooling. The detector was surrounded by Gd-loaded polypropylene to moderate and capture neutrons, a potential source of background. The gamma-rays from neutron capture were detected by 52 modules of plastic scintillator placed around the moderator. The shielding was completed by a 20-cm thick lead castle.

Exclusion limits on the spin-independent WIMP-nucleon elastic scattering cross-section were above 3.9 × 10−8 pb for a 50 GeV WIMP mass.[29] Although not as stringent as results from XENON100,[30] this was achieved with a 10 times smaller fiducial mass and demonstrated the best background discrimination ever achieved in these detectors. The WIMP-neutron spin-dependent cross-section was excluded above 8.0 × 10−3 pb.[31][32] It also ruled out an inelastic WIMP scattering model which attempted to reconcile a positive claim from DAMA with the absence of signal in other experiments.[33]

## Galaxies

This Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) image of the spiral galaxy Messier 81 is in ultraviolet light. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/J. Huchra (Harvard-Smithsonian CfA).{{free media}}

Schematic diagram shows the operation of a microchannel plate. Credit: Andreas 06.{{free media}}

The telescope aboard the Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX or Explorer 83 or SMEX-7) was a 50 cm (20 in) modified Ritchey–Chrétien telescope with a rotating grating prism, a combination of a prism and grating arranged so that light at a chosen central wavelength passes straight through. GALEX used the first ever UV light dichroic beam-splitter flown in space to direct photons to the Near UV (175-280 nanometers) and Far UV (135-174 nanometers) microchannel plate detectors. Each of the two detectors has a 65 mm (2.6 in) diameter.

## Galaxy clusters

The ACIS focal plane array appears from the vantage point of looking down the telescope. Credit: NASA.{{free media}}

The pseudo-colour image is of the large-scale radio structure of the FRII radio galaxy 3C98. Lobes, jet and hotspot are labelled. Credit: Mhardcastle.{{free media}}

The CCD chips are in the square (imaging on the right) and rectangular (spectroscoping) arrays. In a flight configuration, you would not see the arrays, as the optical blocking filters would be in place.

ACIS is a focal plane instrument that uses an array of charge-coupled devices (microchannel plate detector) that serve as an X-ray integral field spectrograph for Chandra capable of measuring both the position and energy of incoming X-rays.[34]

The CCD sensors of ACIS operate at −120 °C (−184 °F) and its filters at −60 and −50 °C (−76 and −58 °F) by having a special heater that allows contamination from Chandra to be baked off; the spacecraft contains lubricants, and the ACIS design took this into account in order to clean its sensors of contamination buildup that can reduce the instrument's sensitivity.[35] Radiation in space is another potential danger to the sensor.[36]

The intergalactic medium (IGM) is a rarefied plasma.[37]

"The Chandra observations found evidence for the massive and hot intergalactic medium filaments by noting a slight dimming in distant quasar X-rays likely caused by hot gas absorption."[38]

## Gamma rays

High-purity germanium detector (disconnected from liquid nitrogen dewar) is imaged. Credit: Sergio.ballestrero.{{free media}}

A Germanium detector spectrum shows the electron-positron annihilation radiation peak (under the arrow). Note the width of the peak compared to the other gamma rays visible in the spectrum. Credit: Hidesert.{{free media}}

In order to achieve a high probability of detection, semiconductors having a high atomic number such as germanium, gallium arsenide or cadmium telluride, with a relatively large thickness of the single crystal, are used for gamma radiation.[39] Semiconductor detectors made of germanium, such as the HP-Ge detector shown (right), must be cooled to liquid nitrogen temperature (77 K) because they have a very high leakage current at room temperature, which would lead to the destruction of the detector at the necessary operating voltage.[39]

## High-velocity galaxies

FORS1 is on the telescope simulator during flexure tests. Credit: I. Appenzeller, K. Fricke, W. Fürtig, W. Gässler, R. Häfner, R. Harke, H.-J. Hess, W. Hummel, P. Jürgens, R.-P. Kudritzki, K.-H. Mantel, W. Meisl, B. Muschielok, H. Nicklas, G. Rupprecht, W. Seifert, O. Stahl, T. Szeifert, K. Tarantik.{{fairuse}}

FORS1 is installed on Unit Telescope 1 of the VLT. Credit: I. Appenzeller, K. Fricke, W. Fürtig, W. Gässler, R. Häfner, R. Harke, H.-J. Hess, W. Hummel, P. Jürgens, R.-P. Kudritzki, K.-H. Mantel, W. Meisl, B. Muschielok, H. Nicklas, G. Rupprecht, W. Seifert, O. Stahl, T. Szeifert, K. Tarantik.{{fairuse}}

The optical spectrum is for the BL Lac object PG 1553+11. Credit: Rfalomo.{{free media}}

The BL Lac object H 0323+022 (z=0.147) is imaged at ESO NTT (R filter). The host galaxy and close companions are visible. Credit: Renato Falomo.{{free media}}

In contrast to other types of active galactic nuclei, BL Lacs are characterized by rapid and large-amplitude flux variability and significant optical polarization.[40] Because of these properties, the prototype of the class (BL Lacertae, BL Lac) was originally thought to be a variable star, but when compared to the more luminous active nuclei (quasars) with strong emission lines, BL Lac objects have spectra dominated by a relatively featureless non-thermal emission continuum over the entire electromagnetic range.[41] This lack of spectral lines historically hindered BL Lac's identification of their nature and proved to be a hurdle in the determination of their distance.[41]

The second image down on the right was obtained using the Very Large Telescope (VLT) with the FOcal Reducer/low dispersion Spectrograph (FORS1) attached.

## Interferences

Def. "an effect caused by the superposition of two systems of waves"[42] or "a distortion on a broadcast signal due to atmospheric or other effects"[42] is called an interference.

Def. "undesirable signals from a neighbouring transmission circuit; undesired coupling between circuits"[43] or the "situation where one or more components of a signal transduction pathway affect another pathway"[44] is called crosstalk.

Def. "[blocking] or [confusing] a broadcast signal"[45] is called jamming.

Def. the "deliberate radiation or reradiation of mechanical or electroacoustic signals with the objectives of obliterating or obscuring signals that an enemy is attempting to receive and of disrupting enemy weapons systems"[46] is called acoustic jamming (JP 1-02 Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms).

## Lithometeors

The in situ dust detector from the AIM-Satellite is called the Cosmic Dust Experiment. Credit: Dieter K. Bilitza, NASA.{{free media}}

"The AIM scientific objectives will be achieved by measuring near simultaneous [Polar Mesospheric Clouds] PMC abundances, PMC spatial distributions, cloud particle size distributions, gravity wave activity, cosmic dust influx to the atmosphere needed to study the role of these particles as nucleation sites and precise, vertical profile measurements of temperature, H2O, OH, CH4, O3, CO2, NO, and aerosols. AIM carries three instruments: an infrared solar occultation differential absorption radiometer, ... (Solar Occultation for Ice Experiment, SOFIE); a panoramic ultraviolet imager (Cloud Imaging and particle Size Experiment, CIPS); and, an in-situ dust detector (Cosmic Dust Experiment, CDE)".[47]

The instrument records impacts from cosmic dust particles as they enter Earth's upper atmosphere using fourteen polyvinylidene fluoride detectors, which emit a pulse of charge when impacted by a hypervelocity dust particle (velocity 1 km/s (0.62 mi/s)), measuring the value and variability of the cosmic dust input, where the CDE is a nearly identical replica to the Student Dust Counter on the New Horizons mission.[48]

## Mesons

Diagram shows a continuous operation cloud chamber. Credit: Nuledo.{{free media}}

Alcohol (typically isopropanol) is evaporated by a heater in a duct in the upper part of the cloud chamber. Vapour descents to the black refrigerated plate and saturates. Due to the temperature gradient a thin layer of oversaturated vapour is formed above the bottom plate. In this region, radiation particles can induce condensation and create cloud tracks.

The discovery of the kaon was made using a cloud chamber as the detector.[49]

## Meteors

The white spot on this image of the Earth side of the Moon is the impact site of a meteor from March 17, 2013. Credit: NASA.{{free media}}

This is a Hubble Space Telescope image taken on July 23, 2009, showing a blemish of about 5,000 miles long left by the 2009 Jupiter impact.[50] Credit: NASA, ESA, and H. Hammel (Space Science Institute, Boulder, Colo.), and the Jupiter Impact Team.{{free media}}

Usually, a meteor detector is designed for another form of radiation that the meteor may radiate.

In the image at right, a 0.3 m meteor has impacted a meteor detector, in this case the Moon, and created a scintillation event that in turn is detected by a photoelectronic detector system.

In the image at left, a meteor has impacted another detector, here Jupiter, but instead of a scintillation event has created a lowering of albedo as detected by the photoelectronic system, the Hubble Space Telescope.

## Microwaves

The QUIET module is a pseudo-correlation receiver comprising low noise amplifiers, phase shifters, detector diodes, and passive components. Credit: Immanuel Buder and the QUIET collaboration.{{fairuse}}

At right is an image of the QUIET module, a pseudo-correlation receiver comprising low noise amplifiers, phase shifters, detector diodes, and passive components. On the left is the first QUIET module which includes the "low noise amplifiers[, an] InP monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC) high electron mobility transistor (HEMT) amplifiers."[51] The upper right shows "an earlier prototype 90 GHz module. The modules are 1.25 x 1.14."[51] The lower right is "the interior of a (2 x 2) 40 GHz module."[51]

## Muons

The Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) is an example of a large particle detector. Notice the person for scale. Credit: CERN.{{free media}}

"With γ ray energy 50 times higher than the muon energy and a probability of muon production by the γ's of about 1%, muon detectors can match the detection efficiency of a GeV satellite detector if their effective area is larger by 104."[52]

## Nebulas

This color picture was made by combining several exposures taken on the night of December 28th 1994 at the 0.9 m telescope of the Kitt Peak National Observatory. Credit: N.A.Sharp/NOAO/AURA/NSF.{{free media}}

A specially developed CCD in a wire-bonded package is used for ultraviolet imaging. Credit: NASA.{{free media}}

"This color picture was made by combining several exposures taken on the night of December 28th 1994 (UT of observation 29/12/94 around 04:00) with a 2048x2048 CCD detector at the 0.9m telescope of the Kitt Peak National Observatory. Observing conditions were not ideal throughout, and so only a select few of the original observations were used. The final tally used five frames in the B (blue) filter for a total of 22 minutes, three frames with the V (green) filter, 15 minutes, and two with the R (red), total 10 minutes. Each frame was carefully cleaned, a particularly difficult task for the blue filter due to internal reflection problems in the telescope, and then aligned and combined by computer to create this (approximately) true color picture."[53]

The basis for the CCD is the metal–oxide–semiconductor (MOS) structure,[54] with MOS capacitors being the basic building blocks of a CCD,[55][56] and a depleted MOS structure used as the photodetector in early CCD devices.[54][57]

## Neutrinos

The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory, a 12-meter sphere filled with heavy water surrounded by light detectors located 2000 meters below the ground in Sudbury, Ontario, Canada. Credit: NASA.

Neutrino detectors are often built underground to isolate the detector from cosmic rays and other background radiation.[58]

The advantages of using heavy water as a detector for solar neutrinos is that it makes the detector sensitive to two reactions, one reaction sensitive to all neutrino flavours, the other reaction sensitive to only electron neutrino; thus, such a detector could measure neutrino oscillations directly.[59]

The Sudbury Neutrino Observatory detector target consisted of 1,000 tonnes (1,102 short tons) of heavy water contained in a 6-metre-radius (20 ft) polymethyl methacrylate vessel, with the detector cavity outside the vessel filled with normal water to provide both buoyancy for the vessel and radiation shielding, where the heavy water was viewed by approximately 9,600 photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) mounted on a geodesic sphere at a radius of about 850 centimetres (28 ft), where he cavity housing the detector was the largest in the world at such a depth,[60] requiring a variety of high-performance rock bolting techniques to prevent rock bursts.

## Neutrons

This image shows a Bonner Ball Neutron Detector which is housed inside the small plastic ball when the top is put back on. Credit: Tony Choy of NASA{{free media}}.

Because free neutrons are unstable, they can be obtained only from nuclear disintegrations, nuclear reactions, and high-energy reactions (such as in cosmic radiation showers or accelerator collisions).

Detection approaches for neutrons fall into several major categories:[61]

• Absorptive reactions with prompt reactions - Low energy neutrons are typically detected indirectly through absorption reactions. Typical absorber materials used have high cross sections for absorption of neutrons and include Helium-3, Lithium-6, Boron-10, and Uranium-235. Each of these reacts by emission of high energy ionized particles, the ionization track of which can be detected by a number of means. Commonly used reactions include 3He(n,p) 3H, 6Li(n,α) 3H, 10B(n,α) 7Li and the fission of uranium.[61]
• Activation processes - Neutrons may be detected by reacting with absorbers in a radiative capture, spallation or similar reaction, producing reaction products which then decay at some later time, releasing beta particles or gamma rays. Selected materials (e.g., indium, gold, rhodium, iron (56Fe(n,p)56Mn), aluminum27Al(n,α)24Na), niobium (93Nb(n,2n)92mNb), & silicon (28Si(n,p)28Al)) have extremely large cross sections for the capture of neutrons within a very narrow band of energy. Use of multiple absorber samples allows characterization of the neutron energy spectrum. Activation also allows recreation of an historic neutron exposure (e.g., forensic recreation of neutron exposures during an accidental criticality).[61]
• Elastic scattering reactions (also referred to as proton-recoil) - High energy neutrons are typically detected indirectly through elastic scattering reactions. Neutron collide with the nucleus of atoms in the detector, transferring energy to that nucleus and creating an ion, which is detected. Since the maximum transfer of energy occurs when the mass of the atom with which the neutron collides is comparable to the neutron mass, hydrogenous [materials with a high hydrogen content such as water or plastic] materials are often the preferred medium for such detectors.[61]

The Bonner Ball Neutron Detector "BBND ... determined that galactic cosmic rays were the major cause of secondary neutrons measured inside ISS. The neutron energy spectrum was measured from March 23, 2001 through November 14, 2001 in the U.S. Laboratory Module of the ISS. The time frame enabled neutron measurements to be made during a time of increased solar activity (solar maximum) as well as observe the results of a solar flare on November 4, 2001."[62]

"BBND results show the overall neutron environment at the ISS orbital altitude is influenced by highly energetic galactic cosmic rays, except in the South Atlantic Anomaly (SAA) region where protons trapped in the Earth's magnetic field cause a more severe neutron environment. However, the number of particles measured per second per square cm per MeV obtained by BBND is consistently lower than that of the precursor investigations. The average dose-equivalent rate observed through the investigation was 3.9 micro Sv/hour or about 10 times the rate of radiological exposure to the average US citizen. In general, radiation damage to the human body is indicated by the amount of energy deposited in living tissue, modified by the type of radiation causing the damage; this is measured in units of Sieverts (Sv). The background radiation dose received by an average person in the United States is approximately 3.5 milliSv/year. Conversely, an exposure of 1 Sv can result in radiation poisoning and a dose of five Sv will result in death in 50 percent of exposed individuals. The average dose-equivalent rate observed through the BBND investigation is 3.9 micro Sv/hour, or about ten times the average US surface rate. The highest rate, 96 microSv/hour was observed in the SAA region."[62]

## Noises

Graph shows burst noise. Credit: B.J. Gross and C.G. Sodini.{{fairuse}}

Simulated power spectral densities as a function of frequency for various colors of noise (violet, blue, white, pink, brown/red). Credit: Mwchalmers.{{free media}}
Without Gaussian noise is shown. Credit: DrWalencia.{{free media}}
With Gaussian noise is shown. Credit: DrWalencia.{{free media}}

Two-dimensional slice is through 3D Perlin noise. Credit: Reedbeta.{{free media}}

Analog display shows random fluctuations in voltage in pink noise. Credit: Bautsch.{{free media}}

The simplest way to quantize a signal is to choose the digital amplitude value closest to the original analog amplitude. Credit: Gregory Maxwell.{{free media}}

A picture generated with Worley noise's basic algorithm. Credit: Rocchini.{{free media}}

Def. sound "or signal generated by random fluctuations",[63] any "part of a signal or data that reduces the clarity, precision, or quality of the desired output",[64] or the "measured level of variation in gene expression among cells, regardless of source, within a supposedly identical population"[65] is called noise.

In electronics, noise is an unwanted disturbance in an electrical signal.[66]

Def. "[N]oise that has a frequency spectrum of predominantly zero power level over all frequencies except for a few narrow bands or spikes"[67] is called black noise.

Def. a "signal or process with a frequency spectrum such that the spectral energy density is proportional to the frequency"[68] is called blue noise.

Def. "sudden step-like transitions between two or more [discrete voltage or current] levels, as high as several hundred microvolts, at random and unpredictable times"[69] is called burst noise.

The color of noises: The power spectral densities are arbitrarily normalized such that the value of the spectra are approximately equivalent near 1 kHz. Note the slope of the power spectral density for each spectrum provides the context for the respective electromagnetic/color analogy.

Def. "[n]oise or other artifacts caused in the electronic reproduction of sound or music"[70] is called distortion.

Def. "a signal or process with a frequency spectrum that falls off steadily into the higher frequencies,[71] with a pink spectrum"[72] is called a flicker noise.

Def. "1/f α noises for which the exponent α is not an even integer"[73] is called fractal noise.

Def. "statistical noise having a probability density function (PDF) equal to that of the normal distribution"[74][75] is called a Gaussian noise.

The probability density function ${\displaystyle p}$  of a Gaussian random variable ${\displaystyle z}$  is given by:

${\displaystyle p_{G}(z)={\frac {1}{\sigma {\sqrt {2\pi }}}}e^{-{\frac {(z-\mu )^{2}}{2\sigma ^{2}}}}}$

where ${\displaystyle z}$  represents the grey level, ${\displaystyle \mu }$  the mean grey value and ${\displaystyle \sigma }$  its standard deviation.[76]

Def. "a type of noise commonly used as a procedural texture primitive in computer graphics"[77] is called a gradient noise.

Def. a "signal or process with a frequency spectrum such that the spectral energy density is such that the listener perceives that it is [perceived by the listener as][78] equally loud at all frequencies"[79] is called a grey noise.

Def. an "abrupt and unwanted variation of one or more signal characteristics"[80] is called jitter.

Def. the "electronic noise generated by the thermal agitation of the charge carriers (usually the electrons) inside an electrical conductor at equilibrium, which happens regardless of any applied voltage"[81] is called Johnson-Nyquist noise, Johnson noise, or thermal noise.

Def. noise that occurs where current divides between two (or more) paths as a result of random fluctuations during this division,[82] is called partition noise.

Def. random-"looking visual noise generated by a function and widely used in computer graphics to simulate effects such as fire and clouds"[83] is called Perlin noise.

Def. a "signal or process with a frequency spectrum such that the spectral energy density is proportional to the reciprocal of the frequency"[84] is called pink noise.

Def. the "difference between the original signal and the reconstructed signal"[85] is called the quantization noise.

The example in the image (seven down on the right) shows the original analog signal (green), the quantized signal (black dots), the signal reconstructed from the quantized signal (yellow) and the difference between the original signal and the reconstructed signal (red).

Def. a "signal or process with a frequency spectrum such that the spectral energy density is proportional to the reciprocal of the frequency squared (1/f2)"[86] is called red noise.

Def. "noise due to random variations in the number and velocity of electrons or photons in a device"[87] is called shotnoise or shot noise.

Noise that depends mostly on device type is called shot noise.[66][88]

Shot noise has been demonstrated in mesoscopic resistors when the size of the resistive element becomes shorter than the electron–phonon scattering length.[89]

Def. "a method for constructing an n-dimensional noise function comparable to Perlin noise ("classic" noise) but with [fewer directional artifacts and, in higher dimensions,][90] a lower computational overhead"[91] is called simplex noise.

Def. "a function that creates a divergence-free field"[92] is called simulation noise.

Def. "a type of noise commonly used as a procedural texture primitive in computer graphics"[93] is called value noise.

Def. a "signal or process with a frequency spectrum such that the spectral energy density is proportional to the frequency squared"[94] is called a violet noise.

Def. a "random signal (or process) with a flat power spectral density; a signal with a power spectral density that has equal power in any band, at any centre frequency, having a given bandwidth"[95] or any "nondescript noise used for background or to mask or drown out other noise"[96] is called white noise.

Def. a noise function used to create procedural textures automatically with arbitrary precision and do not have to be drawn by hand[97] is called Worley noise.

In the image on the right of Worley noise, tweaking of seed points and colors would be necessary to make this look like stone.

## Opticals

Array of 30 CCDs used on the Sloan Digital Sky Survey telescope imaging camera, an example of "drift-scanning". Credit: Sloan Digital Sky Survey.{{free media}}

Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) image of quasar 3C 273, illustrating the object's star-like appearance. The quasar's jet can be seen extending downward and to the right from the quasar. Credit: Sloan Digital Sky Survey.

“Maps of the radio structure of the quasar 3C273 provide evidence of a superluminal expansion during the period 1977-1980. The superluminal expansion might be attributed to the movement of a single knot away from the nucleus along the jet. The apparent constant velocity of 10 times the speed of light is an important constraint on theories of apparent superluminal expansion.”[98]

## Overvoltages

This type of main surge arrestor is used in telecom devices such as phones, faxes and modems. Credit: Miikka Raninen.{{free media}}

Def. "the difference between the electric potential of an electrode or cell under the passage of a current and the thermodynamic value of the electrode or cell potential in the absence of electrolysis"[99] or "the hazardous condition that occurs when the voltage in a circuit is raised above that for which it was designed"[99] is called an overvoltage.

Fast, short duration electrical transients (overvoltages) in the electric potential of a circuit are typically caused by

• Lightning strikes,
• Power outages,
• Tripped circuit breakers,
• Short circuits,
• Power transitions in other large equipment on the same power line,
• Malfunctions caused by the power source,
• Electromagnetic pulses (EMP) with electromagnetic energy distributed typically up to the 100 kHz and 1 MHz frequency range, or
• Inductive spikes.

An avalanche diode, transient voltage suppression diode, transil, varistor, overvoltage crowbar (circuit), or a range of other overvoltage protective devices can divert (shunt) this transient current thereby minimizing voltage.[100]

## Photopeak efficiency

Def. "the fraction of photoelectric events which end up in the photopeak of the measured energy spectrum"[101] is called the photopeak efficiency (ε).

Ending up in the photopeak means within ± 1 full-width at half maximum (FWHM) of the peak of the distribution.[101]

"The peak to valley ratio is commonly used as a token for ε."[101]

"Another common practice is to fit an exponential function to the “valley” and to extrapolate the fit to lower pulse heights to estimate the fraction of counts hidden in the Compton continuum."[101]

"We have used a calibrated Cs137 source to determine the absolute photopeak efficiency at 662 keV. The source was placed at a sufficiently large distance from the detector so that the event rate was low and the dead time was less than 20%. Based on a log-histogram of the time intervals between events, the dead-time has been estimated to a fractional accuracy of better than 5%. We determine the photopeak efficiency by comparing the dead-time corrected event rate in the photopeak with the theoretical expectation assuming a perfect detector."[101]

## Positrons

Cloud chamber photograph is used to prove the existence of the positron. Credit: Carl D. Anderson.{{free media}}

"A 63 million volt positron (Hρ = 2.1×105 gauss-cm) passing through a 6 mm lead plate and emerging as a 23 million volt positron (Hρ = 7.5×104 gauss-cm). The length of this latter path is at least ten times greater than the possible length of a proton path of this curvature."[102] The thick horizontal line is a lead plate. The positron entered the cloud chamber in the lower left, was slowed down by the lead plane, and curved to the upper left. The curvature of the path is caused by an applied magnetic field that acts perpendicular to the image plane. The higher energy of the entering positron resulted in lower curvature of its path.

"In the first 18 months of operations, AMS-02 recorded 6.8 million positron (an antimatter particle with the mass of an electron but a positive charge) and electron events produced from cosmic ray collisions with the interstellar medium in the energy range between 0.5 giga-electron volt (GeV) and 350 GeV. These events were used to determine the positron fraction, the ratio of positrons to the total number of electrons and positrons. Below 10 GeV, the positron fraction decreased with increasing energy, as expected. However, the positron fraction increased steadily from 10 GeV to 250 GeV. This increase, seen previously though less precisely by instruments such as the Payload for Matter/antimatter Exploration and Light-nuclei Astrophysics (PAMELA) and the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, conflicts with the predicted decrease of the positron fraction and indicates the existence of a currently unidentified source of positrons, such as pulsars or the annihilation of dark matter particles. Furthermore, researchers observed an unexpected decrease in slope from 20 GeV to 250 GeV. The measured positron to electron ratio is isotropic, the same in all directions."[103]

## Protons

This is an image of the alpha particle X-ray spectrometer (APXS). Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech.{{free media}}

The stopping power of aluminum for protons is plotted versus proton energy. Credit: H.Paul.

Some of the alpha particles are absorbed by the atomic nuclei. The [alpha,proton] process produces protons of a defined energy which are detected. Sodium, magnesium, silicon, aluminium and sulfur can be detected by this method. This method was only used in the Mars Pathfinder APXS.

At right, the second figure shows the stopping power of aluminum metal single crystal for protons.

"Choosing materials with the largest stopping powers enables thinner detectors to be produced with resulting benefits in radiation tolerance (which is a bulk effect) and lower leakage currents. Alternatively, choosing smaller stopping powers will increase scattering efficiency, which is a requirement for polarimetry, or say, the upper detection plane of a double Compton telescope."[104]

## Signal-to-noise ratios

Def. a "figure of merit comparing the strength of a signal carrying information to the noise interfering with it"[105] is called a signal-to-noise ratio.

Noise is also typically distinguished from distortion, which is an unwanted alteration of the signal waveform, for example in the signal-to-noise and distortion ratio (SINAD). In a carrier-modulated passband analog communication system, a certain carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR) at the radio receiver input would result in a certain signal-to-noise ratio in the detected message signal. In a digital communications system, a certain Eb/N0 (normalized signal-to-noise ratio) would result in a certain bit error rate (BER).

## Spikes

Voltage spikes are illustrated. Credit: JHPrime.{{free media}}

Def. a "sharp peak on a graph"[106] is called a spike.

Def. "a fast, short duration surge (overvoltage) in the electric potential of a circuit"[107] or "a power surge"[107] is called a voltage spike.

Clamping voltage, also known as the let-through voltage specifies what spike voltage will cause the protective components inside a surge protector to short or clamp.[108] The standard let-through voltage for 120 V AC devices is 330 volts.[109]

An average surge (spike) is of short duration, lasting for nanoseconds to microseconds, and experimentally modeled surge energy can be less than 100 joules.[110]

The effective surge energy absorption capacity of the entire system is dependent on the MOV matching so derating by 20% or more is usually required, which can be managed by using carefully matched sets of MOVs, matched according to manufacturer's specification.[111][112]

Surge protectors don't operate instantaneously; a slight delay exists, some few nanoseconds. With longer response time and depending on system impedance, the connected equipment may be exposed to some of the surge; however, surges typically are much slower and take around a few microseconds to reach their peak voltage, and a surge protector with a nanosecond response time would kick in fast enough to suppress the most damaging portion of the spike.[113]

Slower-responding technologies (notably, GDTs) may have difficulty protecting against fast spikes; therefore, good designs incorporating slower but otherwise useful technologies usually combine them with faster-acting components, to provide more comprehensive protection.[114]

Systems used to reduce or limit high-voltage surges[115][116] can include one or more of the following types of electronic components. Some surge suppression systems use multiple technologies, since each method has its strong and weak points.[114][117][118]

A metal oxide varistor (MOV) consists of a bulk semiconductor material (typically sintered granular zinc oxide) that can conduct large currents when presented with a voltage above its rated voltage.[109][119]

MOVs have finite life expectancy and degrade when exposed to a few large transients, or many small transients.[120][121] In a power circuit, you may get a dramatic meltdown or even a fire if not protected by a fuse of some kind.[122]

Transient-voltage-suppression diode (TVS) diodes are often used in high-speed but low-power circuits, such as occur in data communications and can be paired in series with another diode to provide low capacitance.[123]

## Stopping power

Diagram shows the electronic and nuclear stopping power for aluminum ions in aluminum. Credit: HPaul.{{free media}}

This is an illustration of the slowing down of a single ion in a solid material. Credit: Kai Nordlund.{{free media}}

Graphic shows relationships between radioactivity and detected ionizing radiation. Credit: Doug Sim.{{free media}}

Def the retarding force acting on charged particles, typically alpha and beta particles, due to interaction with matter, resulting in loss of particle energy[124][125] is called stopping power.

Its application is important in areas such as radiation protection, ion implantation and nuclear medicine.[126]

The stopping power depends on the type and energy of the radiation and on the properties of the material through which it passes; e.g., since the production of an ion pair (usually a positive ion and a (negative) electron) requires a fixed amount of energy (say, 33.97 eV in dry air[127]:305), the number of ionizations per path length is proportional to the stopping power, where the stopping power of the material is numerically equal to the loss of energy E per unit path length, x:

${\displaystyle S(E)=-dE/dx}$

Instead of energy transfer, some models consider the electronic stopping power as momentum transfer between electron gas and energetic ion which is consistent with the Bethe formula in the high energy range.[128]

Def. the slowing down by momentum transfer of a projectile ion due to the inelastic collisions between bound electrons in the medium and the ion moving through it is called the electronic stopping power.[128]

Since the number of collisions an ion experiences with electrons is large, and since the charge state of the ion while traversing the medium may change frequently, it is very difficult to describe all possible interactions for all possible ion charge states; instead, the electronic stopping power is often given as a simple function of energy ${\displaystyle F_{e}(E)}$  which is an average taken over all energy loss processes for different charge states.[129] It can be theoretically determined to an accuracy of a few % in the energy range above several hundred keV per nucleon from theoretical treatments, the best known being the Bethe formula.[129] At energies lower than about 100 keV per nucleon, it becomes more difficult to determine the electronic stopping using analytical models.[129] Real-time Time-dependent density functional theory has been successfully used to accurately determine the electronic stopping for various ion-target systems over a wide range of energies including the low energy regime.[130][131]

Def. the elastic collisions between the projectile ion and atoms in the sample involving the interaction of the ion with the nuclei in the target is called the nuclear stopping power.[132]

## Superluminals

"The existence of superluminal energy transfer has not been established so far, and one may ask why. There is the possibility that superluminal quanta just do not exist, the vacuum speed of light being the definitive upper bound. There is another explanation, the interaction of superluminal radiation with matter is very small, the quotient of tachyonic and electric fine-structure constants being q2/e2 ≈ 1.4 x 10-11 [5], and therefore superluminal quanta are hard to detect."[133]

## Hypotheses

1. The use of satellites should provide ten times the information as sounding rockets or balloons.

A control group for a radiation satellite would contain

2. a two-way communication system,
3. a positional locator,
4. an orientation propulsion system, and
5. power supplies and energy sources for all components.

A control group for radiation astronomy satellites may include an ideal or rigorously stable orbit so that the satellite observes the radiation at or to a much higher resolution than an Earth-based ground-level observatory is capable of.

## References

1. Hekaheka (18 July 2008). "detector". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 2012-06-19. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
2. Light current (May 15, 2013). "Detector (radio)". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 2013-05-25. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
3. Justanother (25 January 2007). Particle detector. San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
4. Pathoschild (27 December 2006). sensor. San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 2012-06-19.
5. Carr, Joseph J. (1990). Old Time Radios! Restoration and Repair. US: McGraw-Hill Professional. pp. 7–9.
6. Collins, Archie Frederick (1922). The Radio Amateur's Hand Book. US: Forgotten Books. pp. 18–22.
7. Hausmann, Erich; Goldsmith, Alfred Norton; Hazeltine, Louis Alan (1922). Radio Phone Receiving: A Practical Book for Everybody. D. Van Nostrand Company. pp. 44–45. ISBN 1-110-37159-4.
8. Hirsch, William Crawford (June 1922). "Radio Apparatus – What is it made of?". The Electrical Record (New York: The Gage Publishing Co.) 31 (6): 393–394. Retrieved 10 July 2018.
9. Thomas H. Lee (2004). The Design of CMOS Radio-Frequency Integrated Circuits
10. Stanley (1919), pp. 311–318
11. Wenzel, Charles (1995). "Simple crystal radio, In: Crystal radio circuits". techlib.com. Retrieved 2009-12-07.
12. Kuhn, Kenneth A. (January 6, 2008). "Diode Detectors, In: Crystal Radio Engineering" (PDF). Prof. Kenneth Kuhn website, Univ. of Alabama. Retrieved 2009-12-07.
13. Hadgraft, Peter. "The Crystal Set 5/6, In: The Crystal Corner". Kev's Vintage Radio and Hi-Fi page. Retrieved 2010-05-28.
14. Kleijer, Dick. "Diodes". crystal-radio.eu. Retrieved 2010-05-27.
16. Marr, Jonathan M.; Snell, Ronald L.; Kurtz, Stanley E. (2015). Fundamentals of Radio Astronomy: Observational Methods. CRC Press. pp. 21–24.
17. Britannica Concise Encyclopedia. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc.. 2008. pp. 1583.
18. Verschuur, Gerrit (2007). The Invisible Universe: The Story of Radio Astronomy (2 ed.). Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 8–10.
19. Lacitis, Erik (2010-04-28). "Seeking the universe from an apple orchard in Brewster, In: The Seattle Times". Retrieved 2018-10-20.
20. Chongkian (24 November 2021). "breakdown voltage". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 2 February 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
21. J. M. Meek and J. D. Craggs, Electrical Breakdown of Gases, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1978.
22. Martin J. Rees (December 1984). "Is the Universe flat?". Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy 5 (4): 331-48. Retrieved 2013-12-18.
23. "Solar Occultation For Ice Experiment". GATS INC. 2010. Retrieved 2010-03-16.
24. Donald J. Williams (May 14, 2012). "Energetic Particles Detector (EPD)". Greenbelt, Maryland USA: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Retrieved 2012-08-11.
25. "The Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere (AIM) mission: Overview and early science results". Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 71 (3-4): 289–299. 2009-03-01. doi:10.1016/j.jastp.2008.08.011. ISSN 1364-6826.
26. Cora E. Randall; Carstens, J.; France, J. A.; Harvey, V. L.; Hoffmann, L.; Bailey, S. M.; Alexander, M. J.; Lumpe, J. D. et al. (2017-07-16). "New AIM/CIPS global observations of gravity waves near 50-55 km: AIM/CIPS Observations of Gravity Waves". Geophysical Research Letters 44 (13): 7044–7052. doi:10.1002/2017GL073943.
27. B. A. Dolgoshein, V. N. Lebedenko & B. I. Rodionov, "New method of registration of ionizing-particle tracks in condensed matter", JETP Lett. 11(11): 351 (1970)
28. P. Sorensen and K. Kamdin (February 27, 2018). "Two distinct components of the delayed single electron noise in liquid xenon emission detectors". Journal of Instrumentation 13: P02032. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/13/02/P02032. Retrieved 30 January 2022.
29. Akimov, D.Yu.; Araújo, H.M.; Barnes, E.J.; Belov, V.A.; Bewick, A.; Burenkov, A.A.; Chepel, V.; Currie, A. et al. (2012). "WIMP-nucleon cross-section results from the second science run of ZEPLIN-III". Physics Letters B (Elsevier BV) 709 (1–2): 14–20. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2012.01.064. ISSN 0370-2693.
30. Aprile, E.; Arisaka, K.; Arneodo, F.; Askin, A.; Baudis, L.; Behrens, A.; Bokeloh, K.; Brown, E. et al. (2011-09-19). "Dark Matter Results from 100 Live Days of XENON100 Data". Physical Review Letters 107 (13): 131302. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.131302. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 22026838.
31. Lebedenko, V. N.; Araújo, H. M.; Barnes, E. J.; Bewick, A.; Cashmore, R. et al. (2009-09-25). "Results from the first science run of the ZEPLIN-III dark matter search experiment". Physical Review D 80 (5): 052010. doi:10.1103/physrevd.80.052010. ISSN 1550-7998.
32. Lebedenko, V. N.; Araújo, H. M.; Barnes, E. J.; Bewick, A.; Cashmore, R.; Chepel, V.; Currie, A.; Davidge, D. et al. (2009-10-08). "Limits on the Spin-Dependent WIMP-Nucleon Cross Sections from the First Science Run of the ZEPLIN-III Experiment". Physical Review Letters 103 (15): 151302. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.103.151302. ISSN 0031-9007. PMID 19905617.
33. Akimov, D.Yu.; Araújo, H.M.; Barnes, E.J.; Belov, V.A.; Bewick, A.; Burenkov, A.A.; Cashmore, R.; Chepel, V. et al. (2010). "Limits on inelastic dark matter from ZEPLIN-III". Physics Letters B 692 (3): 180–183. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2010.07.042. ISSN 0370-2693.
34. "Science Instruments". Chandra X-ray Observatory. NASA/Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory. 19 September 2013. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
35. Roy, Steve; Watzke, Megan (13 November 2003). "Chandra Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer (ACIS) update". NASA. Retrieved 20 January 2017.
36. Grant, Catherine E.; Bautz, Mark W.; Ford, Peter G.; Plucinsky, P. P. (24 July 2014). "Fifteen years of the Advanced CCD Imaging Spectrometer". Proceedings of the SPIE 9144, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray: 91443Q. doi:10.1117/12.2055652.
37. Luiz C. Jafelice, Reuven Opher (July 1992). "The origin of intergalactic magnetic fields due to extragalactic jets". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (Royal Astronomical Society) 257 (1): 135–51.
38. James W. Wadsley; Marcelo I. Ruetalo; J. Richard Bond; Carlo R. Contaldi; Hugh M. P. Couchman; Joachim Stadel; Thomas R. Quinn; Michael D. Gladders (August 20, 2002). The Universe in Hot Gas. NASA. Retrieved 2009-06-19.
39. Rudolf Nicoletti, Michael Oberladstätter and Franz König (2010). Messtechnik und Instrumentierung in der Nuklearmedizin eine Einführung (Metrology and Instrumentation in Nuclear Medicine: An Introduction). University Press. pp. 298.
40. Padovani, Paolo; Giommi, Paolo (15 December 1995). "A Sample-Oriented Catalogue of BL Lacertae Objects". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 277 (4): 1477–1490. doi:10.1093/mnras/277.4.1477.
41. Falomo, Renato (2014). "An Optical View of BL Lacertae Objects". The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review: 44. doi:10.1007/s00159-014-0073-z.
42. SemperBlotto (6 March 2006). "interference". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 30 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
43. SemperBlotto (7 February 2006). "crosstalk". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 30 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
44. Equinox (29 November 2014). "crosstalk". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 30 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
45. 71.74.216.39 (15 February 2008). "jamming". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 30 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
46. RayKiddy (8 July 2009). "acoustic jamming". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 30 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
47. Dieter K. Bilitza (August 16, 2013). "Aeronomy of Ice in the Mesosphere". Washington, DC USA: National Space Science Data Center, NASA. Retrieved 2014-01-08.
48. "Cosmic Dust Experiment (CDE)". Hampton University. 2010. Retrieved 2010-03-16.
49. "The Nobel Prize in Physics 1936". The Nobel Prize. Retrieved 7 April 2015.
50. Dennis Overbye (2009-07-24). Hubble Takes Snapshot of Jupiter’s ‘Black Eye’. New York Times. Retrieved 2009-07-25.
51. Immanuel Buder (30 December 2009). QUIET Instrumentation. Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago. Retrieved 2014-10-18.
52. Francis Halzen; Todor Stanev; Gaurang B. Yodh (April 1, 1997). "γ ray astronomy with muons". Physical Review D Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology 55 (7): 4475-9. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.55.4475. Retrieved 2013-01-18.
53. N. A. Sharp (28 December 1994). The Horsehead Nebula. Kitt Peak, Arizona USA: National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO). Retrieved 2015-09-25.
54. Fossum, E. R.; Hondongwa, D. B. (2014). "A Review of the Pinned Photodiode for CCD and CMOS Image Sensors". IEEE Journal of the Electron Devices Society 2 (3): 33–43. doi:10.1109/JEDS.2014.2306412.
55. Sze, Simon Min; Lee, Ming-Kwei (May 2012). "MOS Capacitor and MOSFET". Semiconductor Devices: Physics and Technology. John Wiley & Sons. Retrieved 6 October 2019.
56. Williams, J. B. (2017). The Electronics Revolution: Inventing the Future. Springer. p. 245.
57. "1960: Metal Oxide Semiconductor (MOS) Transistor Demonstrated". The Silicon Engine (Computer History Museum). Retrieved August 31, 2019.
58. Ian Sample (23 January 2011). "The hunt for neutrinos in the Antarctic, In: The Guardian". Retrieved 2011-06-16.
59. Chen, Herbert H. (September 1984). "Direct Approach to Resolve the Solar-Neutrino Problem". Physical Review Letters 55 (14): 1534–1536. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.1534. PMID 10031848.
60. Brewer, Robert. "Deep Sphere: The unique structural design of the Sudbury Observatory buried within the earth". Canadian Consulting Engineer.
61. Tsoulfanidis, Nicholas (1995). Measurement and Detection of Radiation. Washington, D.C.: Taylor & Francis. pp. 467–501.
62. Tony Choy (July 25, 2012). "Bonner Ball Neutron Detector (BBND)". Johnson Space Center, Human Research Program, Houston, TX, United States: NASA. Retrieved 2012-08-17.
63. Poszwa (10 January 2004). "noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
64. Sonofcawdrey (1 January 2021). "noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
65. Ceyockey (23 September 2005). "noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
66. Motchenbacher, C. D.; Connelly, J. A. (1993). Low-noise electronic system design. Wiley Interscience.
67. Algrif (26 December 2012). "black noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
68. Bequw (29 November 2010). "blue_noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
69. Omegatron (13 October 2006). "burst_noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
70. Adamwiggins (22 December 2004). "distortion". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
71. Light current (24 February 2006). "flicker_noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
72. Omegatron (13 October 2006). "flicker_noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
73. Mandelbrot, Benoit B.; Wallis, James R. (1969). "Computer Experiments with Fractional Gaussian Noises: Part 3, Mathematical Appendix". Water Resources Research 5 (1): 260–267. doi:10.1029/WR005i001p00260.
74. Tudor Barbu (2013). "Variational Image Denoising Approach with Diffusion Porous Media Flow". Abstract and Applied Analysis 2013: 8. doi:10.1155/2013/856876.
75. Barry Truax, ed. (1999). "Handbook for Acoustic Ecology" (Second ed.). Cambridge Street Publishing. Retrieved 2012-08-05.
76. Philippe Cattin (2012-04-24). "Image Restoration: Introduction to Signal and Image Processing". MIAC, University of Basel. Retrieved 11 October 2013.
77. SiegeLord (27 July 2008). "gradient noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
78. Equinox (23 June 2016). "grey_noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
79. Bequw (29 November 2010). "grey_noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
80. Kevin Rector (10 May 2005). "jitter". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
81. Equinox (26 July 2019). "Johnson-Nyquist_noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
82. "Partition noise". Retrieved 2021-11-05.
83. Equinox (31 August 2010). "Perlin noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
84. Dvortygirl (18 August 2005). "pink noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
85. Kvng (19 January 2015). "Quantization (signal processing)". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
86. Bequw (29 November 2010). "red_noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
87. SemperBlotto (22 February 2010). "shotnoise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
88. Kish, L. B.; Granqvist, C. G. (November 2000). "Noise in nanotechnology". Microelectronics Reliability (Elsevier) 40 (11): 1833–1837. doi:10.1016/S0026-2714(00)00063-9.
89. Steinbach, Andrew; Martinis, John; Devoret, Michel (1996-05-13). "Observation of Hot-Electron Shot Noise in a Metallic Resistor". Physical Review Letters 76 (20): 38.6–38.9. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.38. PMID 10060428.
90. GeoManSir (2 May 2015). "simplex noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
91. Numsgil (24 May 2006). "simplex noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
92. Patelm (4 August 2006). "simulation noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
93. SiegeLord (27 July 2008). "value noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
94. Bequw (29 November 2010). "violet_noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
95. Dvortygirl (18 August 2005). "white_noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
96. Dvortygirl (20 August 2005). "white_noise". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
97. Patrick Cozzi; Christophe Riccio (2012). OpenGL Insights. CRC Press. pp. 113–115.
98. T. J. Pearson; S. C. Unwin; M. H. Cohen; R. P. Linfield; A. C. S. Readhead; G. A. Seielstad; R. S. Simon; R. C. Walker (April 1981). "Superluminal expansion of quasar 3C273". Nature 290: 365-8. doi:10.1038/290365a0.
99. SemperBlotto (21 May 2006). "overvoltage". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 2 February 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
100. Transient Protection, LearnEMC Online Tutorial. http://www.learnemc.com/tutorials/Transient_Protection/t-protect.html
101. Henric S. Krawczynski; Ira Jung; Jeremy S. Perkins; Arnold Burger; Michael Groza (October 21, 2004). Thick CZT Detectors for Space-Borne X-ray Astronomy, In: Hard X-Ray and Gamma-Ray Detector Physics VI, 1. 5540. Denver, Colorado USA: The International Society for Optical Engineering. pp. 13. doi:10.1117/12.558912. Retrieved 2013-05-20.
102. Carl D. Anderson (15 March 1933). "The Positive Electron". Physical Review 43 (6): 491-494. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.43.491.
103. Samuel Ting; Manuel Aguilar-Benitez; Silvie Rosier; Roberto Battiston; Shih-Chang Lee; Stefan Schael; Martin Pohl (April 13, 2013). Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer - 02 (AMS-02). Washington, DC USA: NASA. Retrieved 2013-05-17.
104. Alan Owens; A. Peacock (September 2004). "Compound semiconductor radiation detectors". Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physical Research A 531 (1-2): 18-37. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2004.05.071. Retrieved 2013-05-24.
105. RJFJR (13 March 2008). "signal-to-noise ratio". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 2 February 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
106. Paul G (27 June 2005). "spike". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 2 February 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
107. SemperBlotto (16 December 2005). "voltage spike". San Francisco, California: Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Retrieved 2 February 2022. {{cite web}}: |author= has generic name (help)
108. "SPDC Terms C". Retrieved 18 January 2018.
109. Rosch, Winn (May 2008). "UL 1449 3rd Edition" (PDF). Eaton Corporation. Retrieved 12 March 2016.
110. "No Joules for Surges: Relevant and Realistic Assessment of Surge Stress Threats" (PDF). NIST.gov. Retrieved 18 January 2018.
111. Littelfuse, Inc. "EC638 - Littelfuse Varistor Design Examples" (PDF). Littelfuse, Inc. Retrieved 2011-03-29. See pages 7-8, "Parallel Operation of Varistors"
112. "Does Size Really Matter? An Exploration of ... Paralleling Multiple Lower Energy Movs" (PDF). Retrieved 18 January 2018.
113. "SPDC News Slider". Retrieved 18 January 2018.
114. Littelfuse, Inc. "EC640 - Combining GDTs and MOVs for Surge Protection of AC Lines" (PDF). Littelfuse, Inc. Retrieved 2011-03-29.
115. Littelfuse, Inc. "AN9769 - An Overview of Electromagnetic and Lightning Induced Voltage Transients" (PDF). Littelfuse, Inc. Retrieved 2011-03-29.
116. Littelfuse, Inc. "AN9768 - Transient Suppression Devices and Principles" (PDF). Littelfuse, Inc. Retrieved 2011-03-29.
117. Circuit Components Inc. "Filtering and Surge Suppression Fundamentals" (PDF). Circuit Components Inc. Retrieved 2011-03-29. Includes extensive comparison of design tradeoffs among various surge suppression technologies.
118. Underwriters Laboratories. "Application Guideline, UL 6500 - Second Edition". Retrieved 2011-03-29. Connection of MOVs and GDTs in series
119. Littelfuse, Inc. "AN9767 - Littelfuse Varistors: Basic Properties, Terminology and Theory" (PDF). Littelfuse, Inc. Retrieved 2011-03-29.
120. Brown, Kenneth (March 2004). "Metal Oxide Varistor Degradation". IAEI Magazine. Archived on 2011-07-19. Error: If you specify |archivedate=, you must also specify |archiveurl=. Retrieved 2011-03-30.
121. Walaszczyk, et al. 2001 "Does Size Really Matter? An Exploration of ... Paralleling Multiple Lower Energy Movs". See Figures 4 & 5 for Pulse Life Curves.
122. "Application Note 9311, The ABCs of MOVs: How does an MOV fail?" (PDF). p. 10-48. Retrieved 18 January 2018.
123. "SemTech "TVS Diode Application Note" Rev 9/2000". 2009-01-12. See chart entitled "TVS Capacitance vs Transmission Rate"
124. Bragg, W. H. (1905). "On the α particles of radium, and their loss of range in passing through various atoms and molecules". Philosophy Magazine 10 (57): 318. doi:10.1080/14786440509463378.
125. Bohr, N. (1913). "On the Theory of the Decrease of Velocity of Moving Electrified Particles on passing through Matter". Philosophy Magazine 25 (145): 10. doi:10.1080/14786440108634305.
126. ICRU Report 73: Stopping of Ions heavier than Helium, Journal of the ICRU, 5 No. 1 (2005), Oxford Univ. Press ISBN 0-19-857012-0
127. Podgorsak, E. B., ed (2005). Radiation Oncology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency. Retrieved 25 November 2012.
128. Yang, C.; Di Li, Di Li; Geng Wang, Geng Wang; Li Lin, Li Lin; Tasch, A.F.; Banerjee, S. (2002). Quantum mechanical model of electronic stopping power for ions in a free electron gas: In: Ion Implantation Technology. 2002. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on. pp. 556–559. doi:10.1109/IIT.2002.1258065.
129. P. Sigmund: Stopping of heavy ions. Springer Tracts in Modern Physics Vol. 204 (2004) ISBN 3-540-22273-1
130. Zeb, M. Ahsan; Kohanoff, J.; Sánchez-Portal, D.; Arnau, A.; Juaristi, J. I.; Artacho, Emilio (2012-05-31). "Electronic Stopping Power in Gold: The Role of d Electrons and the H/He Anomaly". Physical Review Letters 108 (22): 225504. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.225504. PMID 23003620.
131. Ullah, Rafi; Corsetti, Fabiano; Sánchez-Portal, Daniel; Artacho, Emilio (2015-03-11). "Electronic stopping power in a narrow band gap semiconductor from first principles". Physical Review B 91 (12): 125203. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.91.125203.
132. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (October 2011). Seltzer, Stephen M.. ed. "Fundamental Quantities and Units for Ionizing Radiation". Journal of the ICRU 11 (1): NP.2–NP. doi:10.1093/jicru/ndr012. ICRU report 85a. PMID 24174259. Retrieved 14 December 2012.
133. R Tomaschitz (October 2010). "Superluminal spectral densities of ultra-relativistic electrons in intense electromagnetic wave fields". Applied Physics B Lasers and Optics 101 (1-2): 143-64. doi:10.1007/s00340-010-4182-8. Retrieved 2012-03-21.